Which theological approach emphasizes both Calvinism and Arminianism according to Amyraut?

The choice of Hypothetical Universalism as the correct answer highlights a theological approach that seeks to reconcile elements of both Calvinism and Arminianism, primarily through the work of theologian Moïse Amyraut. This perspective proposes that Christ's atonement is potentially available for all humanity, suggesting a universal scope in God's salvific plan while still affirming the necessity of individual faith for salvation.

This approach illustrates a significant middle ground where God's grace is extended to all people, aligning with the Arminian emphasis on human free will and the possibility of salvation for every individual, while still maintaining certain Calvinist doctrines regarding God's sovereignty and predestination. Hypothetical Universalism asserts that while Christ's atonement is sufficient for all, it is only effective for those who believe, thus embracing a dual emphasis on divine grace and human response.

In contrast, other approaches such as Specific Redemption focus mainly on the idea that Christ died exclusively for the elect, which aligns closely with strict Calvinist thought, while Systematic Theology and Covenant Theology are broader frameworks that do not specifically address the Calvinism-Arminianism debate in the nuanced manner that Hypothetical Universalism does. Therefore, the choice of Hypothetical Universalism clearly captures the