What was the primary criticism of the 1923 General Assembly by the Auburn Affirmation?

The Auburn Affirmation primarily criticized the 1923 General Assembly for its assertion of Scripture's inerrancy. This movement emerged from a group of Presbyterian leaders who were concerned about what they perceived as an overly rigid interpretation of the Bible by church authorities. They believed that the insistence on inerrancy did not allow room for historical and critical scholarship of the Scriptures and was at odds with the more progressive theological understandings of the time.

By emphasizing the inerrancy of Scripture, the General Assembly was seen as taking a stance that could potentially alienate those who valued a more nuanced approach to biblical interpretation. The affirmation sought to uphold a diversity of thought within the church rather than adhering strictly to a literalist view of Scripture, which was becoming increasingly problematic in the face of modern science and scholarly research.

The other options, while significant in their own rights, did not serve as the primary focus of the criticism from the Auburn Affirmation. The movement was more about resisting the rigid dogmatism encapsulated by the inerrancy debates than about the other mentioned theological elements.